Talk:Recommended Reading/Genre fiction: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Whoever put those charts together clearly hasn't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. It's definitely Post-Apocalyptic rather than Cyberpunk." |
imported>Mkoyama No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Whoever put those charts together clearly hasn't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. It's definitely Post-Apocalyptic rather than Cyberpunk. | Whoever put those charts together clearly hasn't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. It's definitely Post-Apocalyptic rather than Cyberpunk. | ||
I did what I could, but this page needs further improvements, ideally by someone who knows how to write html code (as do many, many other pages). In particular, the following needs attention: | |||
(I) Taking the place of the Young Adult section, which I removed, a Children's Literature section should be created. This is a necessary change, since it allows for the inclusion of literature for young children, and reminds wiki readers that Young Adult fiction is in fact for children: a subjective fact, perhaps, but quite universally agreed upon in the context of /lit/. I don't object to Harry Potter and John Green and so on being included in that list under those conditions. | |||
(II) Photos should be added for the titles in the Classic Horror section. | |||
(III) Misattributations should be fixed. For example, the user who posted above me pointed out an issue concerning the classification of a Phillip K. Dick novel. These incorrect or debatable classifications should be addressed. | |||
[[User:Mkoyama|Mkoyama]] ([[User talk:Mkoyama|talk]]) 23:47, April 5, 2016 (UTC)Koyama | |||
Latest revision as of 23:47, 5 April 2016
Whoever put those charts together clearly hasn't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. It's definitely Post-Apocalyptic rather than Cyberpunk.
I did what I could, but this page needs further improvements, ideally by someone who knows how to write html code (as do many, many other pages). In particular, the following needs attention:
(I) Taking the place of the Young Adult section, which I removed, a Children's Literature section should be created. This is a necessary change, since it allows for the inclusion of literature for young children, and reminds wiki readers that Young Adult fiction is in fact for children: a subjective fact, perhaps, but quite universally agreed upon in the context of /lit/. I don't object to Harry Potter and John Green and so on being included in that list under those conditions.
(II) Photos should be added for the titles in the Classic Horror section.
(III) Misattributations should be fixed. For example, the user who posted above me pointed out an issue concerning the classification of a Phillip K. Dick novel. These incorrect or debatable classifications should be addressed.
